March Tele-town Hall: Political Speech on T- Shirts and in Union Halls

March 8, 2018

In this episode,  Dr. John C. Eastman, founding director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, for our March tele-town hall. Dr. Eastman is joined by Ilya Shapiro, who is a 2015 Claremont Institute Lincoln Fellow, senior fellow in constitutional studies at the Cato Institute, and editor-in chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review. The two discuss Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, a case challenging a Minnesota election law which prohibits voters from wearing political apparel at a polling venue. Under this law, voters who wear such apparel are told to remove these items before they can enter the polling place and vote. If they refuse, election officials take down their names for possible prosecution and penalties. This case was argued on February 28, 2018. 

The two also discuss a First Amendment case before the Supreme Court this term, Janus v. American Federation, which questions whether Abood v. Detroit Board of Education should be overruled. The issue before the Court is whether public employee unions may continue to garnish workers’ paychecks to fund the political act of collective bargaining for taxpayer funded wages and benefits. This case was argued on February 26, 2018.

 Dr. Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He served as a law clerk with Justice Clarence Thomas in 1996-97.

00:0000:00

Panel: Trump, Executive Power, and the Bully Pulpit

February 26, 2018

Our distinguished panel looks at how President Trump has approached executive power in important and novel ways, paying special attention to how the President has asserted greater control over the administrative state, curbed the previous Administration’s use of “enforcement discretion” to effectively change law, and used the power of the “bully pulpit” to advance his objectives and inflame his critics. Claremont co-hosted this panel with The Heritage Foundation on February 22, 2018 in Washington, DC.

The panelists:

• John Fonte, Senior Fellow and Director, Center for American Common Culture at the Hudson Institute
• Adam White
, Research fellow, Hoover Institution; Director of the Center for the Study of the Administrative State at George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School
• Charles Kesler
, Editor, Claremont Review of Books; Senior Fellow, Claremont Institute; Professor of Government, Claremont McKenna College
• Ryan Williams (moderator), President, Claremont Institute
• Arthur Milikh (host)
, Associate Director, B. Kenneth Simon Center for Principles and Politics at The Heritage Foundation

00:0000:00

Ryan Williams on James Burnham and Conservatism - 2/6/18

February 8, 2018

Are you familiar with modern conservative political philosopher James Burnham? Though Burnham is a lesser known figure than men such as William F. Buckley Jr. and Russell Kirk, he played an important role in shaping the modern conservative movement. 

Ryan Williams, President of the Claremont Institute, joins The Seth and Chris Show to discuss Burnham and the history of the conservative movement.

00:0000:00

January Tele-town Hall: Voter Fraud and Judicial Deference to the Administrative State

January 22, 2018

In this episode, Dr. John C. Eastman, founding director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, is joined by J. Christian Adams, President and General Counsel of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, founder of the Election Law Center, and formerly an official in the Voting Section of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Eastman will also be joined by Professor Anthony T. Caso, director of the Constitutional Jurisprudence Clinic at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law, which is sponsored by the Claremont Institute’s own Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence. 

During this town hall, Eastman and his guests will discuss Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, a case which addresses whether Ohio’s list-maintenance process violates the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the Help America Vote Act of 2002. The list-maintenance process in question sends a confirmation notice if a voter is inactive for two consecutive years. If the mail returns undelivered and four more years of inactivity pass, the voter is removed from the voting rolls. This case was argued on January 10, 2018.

 They also discuss Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro which concerns whether “service advisors” at car dealerships are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime requirements. The broader issue in question is whether unelected bureaucrats in administrative agencies can unilaterally alter longstanding interpretations of the law. This case was argued on January 17, 2018.

Dr. Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He served as a law clerk with Justice Clarence Thomas in 1996-97.

00:0000:00

December 11 CCJ Town Hall: Religious Liberty and Freedom From Compelled Speech

December 13, 2017

In this episode, Dr. John C. Eastman, founding director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, is joined by: Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute and former Claremont Institute Lincoln Fellow; Dr. David Upham, Director of Legal Students and Associate Professor at the University of Dallas; and Kelly Shackelford, President and CEO of First Liberty Institute.

During this town hall, Eastman and his guests will discuss one of the most important cases being heard by the Supreme Court this term, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, which was argued on, December 5, 2017. The court must decide whether government can compel a U.S. citizen to participate in speech with which he or she fundamentally disagrees and that violates his or her sincerely held religious beliefs.

They also discuss the important case addressing some complicated federalism doctrines, Chris Christie v. NCAA, which was argued on, December 4, 2017.

Dr. Eastman is a Senior Fellow of the Claremont Institute and the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He served as a law clerk with Justice Clarence Thomas in 1996-97.

00:0000:00

Panel: The Tyranny of Identity Politics

November 30, 2017

Charles Kesler, Mark Lilla, Heather Mac Donald, and Ryan Williams examine the political and moral threat of identity politics and the means necessary to reinstate and protect the motto on which our republic stands: e pluribus unum. Claremont hosted this panel on November 9, 2017 at the Harvard Club in NYC.

The panelists:

- Charles Kesler, Editor, Claremont Review of Books; Senior Fellow, The Claremont Institute; Professor, Claremont McKenna College
- Mark Lilla, Professor, Columbia University; Author, The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics
- Heather Mac Donald, Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute; Author, The War on Cops: How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe
- Ryan Williams, President, The Claremont Institute (moderator)

00:0000:00

Angelo Codevilla on Power, Sex, and Politics - 11/28/17

November 29, 2017

Angelo Codevilla, Senior Fellow at the Claremont Institute, joins the Laura Ingraham Radio Show to discuss his latest piece for American Greatness, "Power, Sex, and Politics."

00:0000:00

William Voegeli On The Rise Of The New Left And Conservatism Under Trump - 10/27/17

November 2, 2017

William Voegeli, senior editor of the Claremont Review of Books, joins The Federalist Radio Hour to discuss topics such as the rise of the new radical left, the conservative intellectual movement in the age of Trump, and the impact of human emotion on government.

They discuss free speech and how the new antifa left justifies violence. “Both the left and right are non-absolutists about free speech in particular, and inalienable rights in general,” Voegeli said.

00:0000:00

October 10 CCJ Town Hall: Immigration and Partisan Gerrymandering

October 12, 2017

In this episode, Dr. John C. Eastman, founding director of the Claremont Institute's Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, is joined by Andrew McCarthy, former Assistant U.S. Attorney for New York and a contributing editor of National Review; and J. Christian Adams, General Counsel for the Public Interest Legal Foundation and member of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity.

Eastman and his guests discuss a slate of immigration cases that were argued at the Supreme Court this month: Jennings v. Rodriquez, which addresses the important constitutional question of whether it is permissible for immigration officials to detain criminal aliens for more than six months while deportation proceedings are underway, or must they be released into the interior of the country; and Sessions v. Dimaya, which addresses whether the statutory language, “crime of violence,” that triggers deportation of aliens, is unconstitutionally vague. Estman also provides an update on Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, the case challenging President Trump’s temporary suspension of immigration from six designated middle-eastern countries where terrorist activity is rampant. The case was scheduled to be heard this month, but it was dropped from the Court’s oral argument calendar after President Trump issued a new executive order dealing with the same subject.
 
They also discuss the important case addressing partisan gerrymandering, Gill v. Whitford, which was argued October 3, 2017.
 
Dr. Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University Fowler School of Law. He served as a law clerk with Justice Clarence Thomas in 1996-97.
00:0000:00

October 21 CCJ Town Hall: Criminals, Compensation, and Facial Hair

October 11, 2017

In the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence's inaugural tele-town hall, Dr. John C. Eastman, Founding Director of the Center, is joined by three of his colleagues to discuss several cases currently before the U.S. Supreme Court.  

 
Former Assistant US Attorney Andrew McCarthy joins Dr. Eastman to discuss Heien v. North Carolina and the limits of our Constitution's prohibition on unreasonable search and seizure. 
 
Professor Anthony Caso and Dr. Eastman then consider Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk and the government's interference in determining employee compensation.  
 
Finally, Jordan Lorence, Senior Counsel with the Alliance Defending Freedom, joins to discuss Holt v. Hobbs. While this case offers a different angle on religious liberties, it addresses themes similar to those in Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius
00:0000:00